
Could Anything Unite the United States?
Cultural and political divisions have persisted for decades. Now there’s a growing gap in how Americans see each other.
Could Anything Unite the United States?
This website uses cookies to ensure the best user experience.
Privacy & Cookies Notice
NECESSARY COOKIES These cookies are essential to enable the services to provide the requested feature, such as remembering you have logged in. |
ALWAYS ACTIVE |
Reject | Accept | |
PERFORMANCE AND ANALYTIC COOKIES These cookies are used to collect information on how users interact with Chicago Booth websites allowing us to improve the user experience and optimize our site where needed based on these interactions. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. |
|
FUNCTIONAL COOKIES These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by third-party providers whose services we have added to our pages or by us. |
|
TARGETING OR ADVERTISING COOKIES These cookies collect information about your browsing habits to make advertising relevant to you and your interests. The cookies will remember the website you have visited, and this information is shared with other parties such as advertising technology service providers and advertisers. |
|
SOCIAL MEDIA COOKIES These cookies are used when you share information using a social media sharing button or 鈥渓ike鈥� button on our websites, or you link your account or engage with our content on or through a social media site. The social network will record that you have done this. This information may be linked to targeting/advertising activities. |
|
An emerging literature in psychology and political science has identified political identity as an important driver of political decisions. However, less is known about how a person鈥檚 political identity is incorporated into their broader self-concept and why it influences some people more than others. We examined the role of political identity in representations of the self-concept as one determinant of people鈥檚 political behaviors. We tested the predictions of a recent theoretical account of self-concept representation that, inspired by work on conceptual representation, emphasizes the role of causal beliefs. This account predicts that people who believe that their political identity is causally central (linked to many other features of the self-concept) will be more likely to engage in behaviors consistent with their political identity than those who believe that the same aspect is causally peripheral (linked to fewer other features). Consistent with these predictions, in a study run when political identity was particularly salient鈥攄uring the 2016 U.S. Presidential election鈥攚e found that U.S. voters who believed their political party identity was more causally central (vs. those who believe it was causally peripheral) were more likely to vote for their political party鈥檚 candidate. Further, in two studies, we found that U.K. residents who believed that their English or British national identity was more causally central were more likely to support the U.K. leaving the European Union (Brexit) than those who believed the same identities were more causally peripheral.
Published in: Cognition
Cultural and political divisions have persisted for decades. Now there’s a growing gap in how Americans see each other.
Could Anything Unite the United States?